sadalaw.com

General

Addressing Judicial Issues in Revenge Porn Cases

Trending Today Addressing Judicial Issues in Revenge Porn Cases Triviality section 95 INDIAN YOUNG LAWYERS ASSOCIATION v. STATE OF KERALA & Ors Legal Framework governing reproductive rights and abortion law The Role of International Law in Shaping Domestic Constitutions Indigenous Peoples’ Rights and Cultural Heritage Preservation SPORTA TECHNOILOGIES V. HONG Y1 F35 Addressing Judicial Issues in Revenge Porn Cases 30 jan 2025 Introduction An irreplaceable asset in today’s world for a person is their privacy, dignity, respect and safety. The invention of the internet and the existence of social media has certainly connected us all to a global platform where communication and collaboration was effortless, but joining it comes with its own risks, and one such risk is lack of privacy. We humans are generally motivated by knowing what is happening inside and around us; we tend to invest our shares in the lives of others, which has now become easier thanks to various social media. Revenge pornography, or sharing intimate images without consent, is one such risk that has increased over the years, with the aim of threatening, brutally humiliating and using a person’s shame for selfish pleasure. We live in a society where rape, prostitution, human trafficking, public humiliation, acid attacks, honor killings, dowry etc. The bitter truth of society is that even with proper education and knowledge of the circumstances, society raises questions about the victim’s behavior instead of taking a stand against the criminal. Social media is now a target for such malicious people who target innocent people and use their private moments  to torture and blackmail them to satisfy their barbarity. Before we read more about revenge porn, let’s first find out what is pornography? Presenting sexual activity to excite one person is called pornography. It can be understood as a clear presentation of sexual activity that focuses only on sexual pleasure and nothing else. Various researchers and theorists argue that pornography represents a patriarchal society that views women as objects that must always be silent and subservient to them. There have been various studies that show that these pornographically provocative videos have deceived viewers and often show excessive violence against a person. Now that we are aware of pornography, let’s look at the topic of revenge porn in a little more detail and what it is all about. Revenge pornography refers to the misuse of a person’s personal information and involves stalking and intimidating behavior. It concerns the dissemination of explicit images and videos of a person’s intimate time online without the person’s consent, with the aim of publicly slandering the person and causing shame and humiliation. Usually, when such crimes are mentioned and carried out, it is assumed that only women go through such a traumatic experience, but this could not be further from the truth. This form of non-contractual pornography involves sharing material online or offline, such as uploading and sharing on the Internet, adult websites, social media, sharing via email, etc. The reason for such an unethical act can be as simple as feeling betrayed, anger, resentment for the actions of people or even just a desire to harm others to satisfy one’s fragile ego. Yet nothing is said or done to justify such immoral actions. People who indulge in such actions for a moment of anger or temper are often shallow and lack empathy for others. The difference between revenge porn and regular porn is the purpose for which the video was made. The parties of the pornographic video are aware of  the purpose behind the creation of the video and are aware what the video is created contains and agree to upload the video at their own will; whereas in revenge pornography cases pornographic content is often uploaded as a means of intimidation where offender seeks to ruin the reputation of the victim and in most cases the victim is not aware of this kind betrayal or revenge. Also, the purpose and motto of the uploading such content to the website is different. If the porn content is uploaded to increase the ratings of the porn star, to make a profit and to build a name and gain popularity; the idea behind revenge porn is to hurt the victim and humiliate the victim’s family and cause irreparable damage to the victim’s character. There are also cases where the photos of the victim have been changed into images of porn stars with the help of modern technology, tarnishing their name and character in society, although the victim is not really guilty. Those films or images are taken covertly without the knowledge of the person and are used as a source or source of shame or even in certain cases these videos are used as blackmail material. Porn films are exaggerated videos that are filmed in a similar way to films with regular high definition cameras, with the aim of profiting from these films. They have no reality and are often based on a story that the stars are acting. These are not intimate private moments between people, but the collective work of the entire team that benefits from the distribution of this film. Revenge porn is a crime The intentional distribution of non-contractual porn on the Internet is a type of cyber bullying that occurs when an acquaintance of the victim or a hacker posts a private intimate moment of the victim online as a tactic to punish or humiliate the victim. Cases of revenge porn often make news for celebrities, who often publicly confront such stalkers. Legally, revenge pornography is a form of cyber sexual harassment and in some cases is defined as cyber bullying. Cases of revenge porn are on the rise in our country, and new technological advances are not helping matters. The distribution of such non-consensual content is often considered virtual rape because it offends a person and causes a person’s life value of trauma and confusion. Because revenge pornography is considered a cybercrime, it can be punished with imprisonment and fines. In such scenarios,

Addressing Judicial Issues in Revenge Porn Cases Read More »

Triviality section 95

Trending Today Addressing Judicial Issues in Revenge Porn Cases Triviality section 95 INDIAN YOUNG LAWYERS ASSOCIATION v. STATE OF KERALA & Ors Legal Framework governing reproductive rights and abortion law The Role of International Law in Shaping Domestic Constitutions Indigenous Peoples’ Rights and Cultural Heritage Preservation SPORTA TECHNOILOGIES V. HONG Y1 F35 Triviality section 95 28 jan 2025 Abstract: Actions that are insignificant and cause as little harm as possible and does not require the intervention of judicial proceedings, are called trivial actions. Section 95 of the Indian Penal Code describes recklessness as acts causing slight or no appreciable harm which no person of common sense and character would complain of as appreciable harm. Section 95 of the IPC can be divided into two important parts which apply to an act to determine whether an act is a “significant act” or not. Such action should be done without a reason or intention to cause serious damage to the person; the intention to cause such damage is such that it would not compel an ordinary person to complain about a trivial act. These small actions are done with a small motive or purpose; it could be as simple as stepping on someone’s toe or grabbing a paper from someone’s desk. The purpose of the introduction of this section is to avoid the severe punishment of trivial or trivial actions; otherwise, the courts would be flooded with such complaints that the court, burdened with  these  and other minor matters, could not concentrate on solving the problems of people who have really significant problems that can damage or break their lives. Behind this concept of thought is the maxim “de minimis non curat lex”, which means that when a person is faced with such stupid and trivial actions, he must deal with it himself and the court does not interfere in the matter where the subject of the dispute is. Trivial in nature, but the parties concerned must ensure that none of the parties agrees to such actions that may incriminate them in the eyes of the law. The word harm or intent to harm in trivial actions means “lack of importance” in a man’s actions. Magnitude of the term “injury” The term injury or damage is used in many different parts of the IPC in different senses. The meaning of damages is not defined exclusively  in any of these sections and may be interpreted according to the wording of those respective sections. As, for example, when the term damage in section 415 refers to damage caused to a person’s body, mind, property and reputation. On the other hand, section 95 of the same law uses the term in its broadest sense and includes everything from physical injury caused to a person to emotional stress experienced by him, from financial loss to damage to a person’s reputation and humanity dignity etc. If the harm caused to a person is trivial, for example, someone scratched due to carelessness or even stepping on someone’s toes in a crowded market cannot be considered as a serious matter that requires the intervention of the court. The parties can deal with and resolve the matter themselves without having to go to court and judicial authorities. However, the fact that the damage caused to a person is trivial or minor does not mean that the negligence of the criminal who caused the damage has no consequences. According to the concept of mens rea, the conscious and guilty mind of a person is equally capable of making a person responsible for his actions, even if the damage caused to another person is insignificant. For this, the court ensures that the criminal pays a fine or some kind of compensation that enlightens the person and prevents him from repeating the act in the future. For example, if a person parks a vehicle in a no-parking zone or intentionally or negligently exceeds the speed while driving, he is liable for his negligence even if he did not cause serious damage or injury to anyone. To hold people accountable for such mistakes, the government collects fines and fees to prevent people from making such mistakes. And a person cannot avoid such fines and compensation by taking the defense of negligence mentioned in section 96 of the Civil Code. Is insulting women trivial? Harming women mentally or physically has always been a concern throughout history. Women have always been seen in our society as a weaker and exploitable species that can be abused by men in a patriarchal society, over the decades the perspective of society slowly changed as women gained rights and freedom and rose to a clearer position in society when compared to men. Minor damage or injury to the dignity and respect of women is to be treated as a crime and cannot be considered a trivial act under Section 95 of the Criminal Code. There are several provisions in the IPC which prevent unfairness. Section 354 of the Penal Code deals with crimes that scandalize the modesty of a woman, stating that anyone who attacks or insults a woman with the intention of defaming her modesty and knowing that such an act of the offender can degrade said women in society. Under the section, the offender has been made liable under the IPC for his indecency towards women and  also faces simple or rigorous imprisonment for a term of one to five years or fine or both. Furthermore, Section 509 of the same Act clearly stated that any word or gesture  done intentionally to insult the honor of a woman or violate her privacy. Then, performing such audacity, unpleasant actions are punished by simple imprisonment up to 1 year and a fine, which is decided by the competent court as in the case of Rupan Deol Bajaj vs. KPS Gill (1995). Rupan Deol Bajaj vs. KPS Gill case summary: In that case, the accused was a Superintendent of Police who patted the victim’s (an IAS officer) posterior when they

Triviality section 95 Read More »

Legal Framework governing reproductive rights and abortion law

Legal Framework governing reproductive rights and abortion law 24 jan 2025 Introduction The fundamental basis of India’s abortion legislation is a cis-hetero-patriarchal society that controls expecting mothers’ bodies through a severe criminal justice system. The criminal framework includes the POCSO Act and the PCPNDT Act, which allow for nearly unrestrained law enforcement harassment of abortion providers and seekers and necessitate significant state surveillance.[i] Due to the stigma surrounding abortions that is reinforced by criminalization, pregnant women have few options when it comes to ending their pregnancy. These options include carrying an undesired pregnancy to term and forgoing prenatal and maternal healthcare, or obtaining an unsafe abortion and running the risk of legal repercussions. Essential components of women’s independence and health are reproductive rights, which include the right to a safe and legal abortion. India’s legal system for abortion and reproductive rights has changed significantly over time, striking a balance between individual liberties, public health concerns, and social factors. This blog examines legal interpretation, important statutes, and current issues with reproductive rights and abortion regulations in India. Legal Framework In India, the Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP) Act is a government law that permits licensed medical practitioners to perform abortions in specific predefined situations. This legislation was a progressive move that recognized women’s reproductive rights and attempted to lower maternal mortality from unsafe abortions. Medical terminations of pregnancy were governed by Sections 312 to 318 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) prior to the MTP Act of 1971. The majority of these provisions attempted to criminalize abortions, with the exception of cases where the procedure was performed in good faith to save the woman’s life. It is extremely difficult for women to obtain safe abortions because the IPC laws do not distinguish between unwanted and intended pregnancies. When women, including rape survivors, mentally ill, and those experiencing unintended pregnancies as a result of contraceptive failures, began going to court to seek permission for ending their pregnancies beyond the recommended gestational period of 20 weeks, the 1971 law was unable to keep up with the demands of the changing times and scientific advances in medicine.[ii] In order to lower maternal mortality and morbidity brought on by unsafe abortions, the 2021 Act modification seeks to guarantee women’s access to safe and legal abortion services. The modifications provide abortions up to 24 weeks for specific categories of women, up to 24 weeks for women whose marital status changed during pregnancy, up to 24 weeks for survivors of rape or incest, and up to 24 weeks for other vulnerable women. The amendments also permit abortions up to 20 weeks after the opinion of one licensed medical professional. The modification also made pregnancies outside of marital institutions legally binding by substituting “by any married woman or her husband” with “any woman or her partner.” Existing legislation and policy: what is still lacking? The MTP Act’s significant medical slant is one of its main criticisms. Practitioners of alternative medical systems and mid-level healthcare providers are not covered by the “physicians only” provision. Access to second trimester abortions is further limited by the need for a second medical opinion, particularly in remote locations.[iii] All public hospitals are required by the MTP Act to provide abortion services. Despite this, public health institutions are exempt from the same regulatory processes as the private sector because they are not required to obtain the necessary approval. It is incorrect to believe that simply because a health institution is part of the public sector, it has effective regulatory processes that don’t need to be supported by laws and regulations and is accountable to the general public. Any restrictions of this kind are frequently out-of-date or opaque.[iv] The absence of a clear policy on excellent clinical practice and research constitutes a significant gap in Indian abortion policy. Published in 2001[v]national technical guidelines do not guarantee acceptable clinical practice even at abortion clinics that have been recognized by the WHO, and they do not comply with their international guidance[vi] Protecting women’s reproductive rights: the role of the judiciary The judiciary will inevitably have to handle the problem of reproductive rights as there isn’t a sufficient legislative framework to safeguard women’s reproductive rights. The Indian judiciary has played a pivotal role in safeguarding and augmenting the reproductive rights of women, guaranteeing the preservation of their constitutional entitlements to bodily autonomy, personal liberty, and privacy. In interpreting the Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP) Act and related regulations, the courts have adopted a progressive approach, guaranteeing that the rules are in line with the changing requirements of society and improvements in medicine. In the landmark decision of Suchita Srivastava v. Chandigarh Administration.[vii], the Supreme Court of India upheld the constitutional right of women to reproductive autonomy as a part of their right to personal liberty under Article 21. The court underlined that having the freedom to choose among contraception, abortion, and other reproductive health treatments is part of having reproductive rights. In the case of Meera Santosh Pal v. Union of India[viii], the Supreme Court upheld an abortion due to significant fetal abnormalities that took place beyond the 20-week limit set down in the MTP Act. This ruling emphasized the need for the law to be flexible in order to accommodate extraordinary situations and emphasized how crucial it is to take the woman’s health and well-being into account. In X v. Union of India[ix], the Supreme Court extended the rights of reproductive individuals by permitting an unmarried woman to end a pregnancy that resulted from a consenting relationship. This decision was significant because it recognized that a woman’s autonomy to make choices regarding her reproductive health is not contingent on her marital status and that rights pertaining to procreation are not gender-specific. Challenges and Contemporary issues: Access to secure abortion services: The inability to obtain safe abortion services is one of the major problems. Geographical disparities, particularly those between urban and rural areas, make it more difficult for women from rural areas to access licensed medical facilities

Legal Framework governing reproductive rights and abortion law Read More »

Indigenous Peoples’ Rights and Cultural Heritage Preservation

Indigenous Peoples’ Rights and Cultural Heritage Preservation 22 jan 2025 1. Introduction The indigenous peoples of the world, with their innumerable cultures and diversities of life, history, and traditions, form a significant part of the cultural mosaic. Their rights and cultural heritage have always been major concerns regarding threats from various fronts: colonization, modernity, and environmental degradation. Preserving the cultural heritage of indigenous communities, while at the same time upholding their rights, is indeed an extremely complex issue with intricate details. This essay discusses the legal frameworks, international agreements, and challenges correlated with indigenous peoples’ rights to cultural heritage preservation. It reflects on the role of international law, challenges brought about by modern challenges, and the need to preserve the indigenous cultural heritage for future generations. 2. Historical Context and Legal Framework The history of indigenous peoples worldwide is scared by colonization, marginalization, and suppression of their cultural heritage. Land was taken away as the colonial masters introduced their sets of laws and delved into disregard for laws and customs of people indigenous to them. For example, the colonization of the Europeans in America saw many indigenous communities displaced and cultures decimated. The colonization of the British in Australia led to the near extinction of languages and cultural practices amongst Aborigines.  3. International Legal Frameworks Several international legal regimes have been elaborated, responding to historical injustices for the protection of the rights of indigenous people to their cultural heritage. Core documents include: a. United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) Adopted by the United Nations General Assembly in 2007, UNDRIP represents the milestone in recognizing indigenous peoples’ rights. The UNDRIP enumerates the collective rights of indigenous peoples to self-government, land, culture, and involvement in decision-making processes. The UNDRIP attaches a great deal of importance to the preservation of indigenous cultural heritage and lays down that indigenous peoples are in control over traditional knowledge and practices. b. Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) The CBD, signed in 1992, is an acknowledgment that traditional knowledge and practices are significant in biodiversity conservation. It encourages active participation of indigenous peoples in management and protection within their respective traditional lands and knowledge. The Nagoya Protocol to the CBD, adopted in 2010, provides a legal framework aimed at the fair and equitable sharing of benefits arising from the utilization of genetic resources and traditional knowledge. c. International Labour Organization Convention No. 169 Adopted in 1989, ILO Convention No. 169 is a comprehensive international instrument that covers a wide range of rights for indigenous and tribal peoples, including issues relating to land, participation in decision-making, and cultural preservation. Convention No. 169 is legally binding upon the ratifying countries and as such provides a legal framework for the protection of indigenous cultural heritage. d. World Heritage Convention It was adopted in 1972 and focuses on protection of the cultural and natural heritage of outstanding universal value. Though it does not specifically address the rights of indigenous peoples, many indigenous sites have been recognized within this framework. The Convention encourages the participation of indigenous peoples in the management and conservation at World Heritage sites. 4. Cultural Heritage Protection a. Importance of Cultural Heritage Cultural heritage is the ensemble of all traditions, languages, art, rituals, and practices that identify a community. In the case of indigenous people, it is directly linked to their relationship with the land and natural resources. It is crucial in maintaining their social cohesion, historical continuity, and cultural diversity. This heritage needs preservation not only for the communities themselves but for humanity as a whole, for its contribution to global cultural diversity. 5. Challenges on Cultural Heritage  a. Environmental Degradation The greatest threat to indigenous peoples’ culture is environmental degradation. Deforestation, mining, and industrial agriculture all disrupt the homelands and ecosystems on which people have traditionally relied. Deforestation in the Amazon Rainforest alone has taken not only a toll on the biodiversity in the region but threatened the culture which indigenous communities have with the forest for their livelihoods and spiritual practices. b. Globalization and Modernity Globalization and modernity result in the homogenization of cultures and erosion of the traditional practices thereof. The challenges regarding any indigenous culture are that they may be overpowered by Western values and a way of life. They may lose traditional knowledge and practices within such influence. The spread of technology and mass media often converts into cultural assimilation and further marginalizes languages and cultures of indigenous communities. c. Legal and Political Challenges The concept of indigenous cultural heritage is often mired in judicial and political tussles. Conflicting rights over land, inadequate legal provisions, and lack or minimal representation in decision-making forums all combine to work against any possibility of preservation. Very often, court cases regarding land ownership and the extraction of resources have placed indigenous cultural sites under threat. 6. International and National Efforts in Preservation International Initiatives a. UNESCO’s Intangible Cultural Heritage Program UNESCO’s ICH program was devised to preserve cultural practices and traditions important to communities for their identities. It aids in the identification and preservation of intangible cultural heritage in various ways, one of which includes the Representative List of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity. A few of the indigenous practices have been included in this list, such as certain traditional dances and rituals, proving their significance and a need for their preservation.  b. Convention for Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage Adopted in 2003, the Convention deals with safeguarding intangible cultural heritage, including oral traditions, performing arts, and traditional knowledge. It emphasizes the role of communities in the preservation process and encourages the establishment of national inventories and safeguarding measures. This Convention provides a framework for protecting indigenous cultural practices from extinction. 7. National Legislation and Policies  a. Australia’s Native Title Act 1993  Australia’s Native Title Act acknowledges the rights of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples to their various lands and waters. It provides legal provision for the making of claims on and the protection of native title, assists in the

Indigenous Peoples’ Rights and Cultural Heritage Preservation Read More »